Click Here To Visit The SRGC Main Site
Speaking of G. r-o 'Ruby's Green Dream', does anyone have anecdotal stories surrounding Ruby Baker and the naming of this relatively new G. r-o?
The original snowdrop named 'Ruby Baker' was a snowdrop that Ruby had admired on a garden visit. The act of naming was a spontaneous act of goodwill and friendship without thought to whether the snowdrop was merely nice or a great snowdrop that should commemorate a great galanthophile. John Grimshaw gave some more details here: http://johngrimshawsgardendiary.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/ruby-baker-1923-2014.html .Joe Sharman was of the opinion that this snowdrop was not memorable enough so when he originated a reginae-olgae with strong green markings on the outer petals, the first of its kind in this species to be commercially available, he sold it as Galanthus reginae-olgae 'Ruby Baker' (beginning in 2012, I think). But naming rules apply to genus rather than species so Joe always knew that he was unlikely to be allowed to get away with this and thus he was obliged, after a while, to come up with a new official name. He discussed various options with Ruby and decided that the best of these, of which she approved, was 'Ruby's Green Dream'.
He was still selling it as 'Ruby Baker' at the Great Dixter Plant Fair last weekend.
Just to show how fickle they are. As I said in a previous post 'Rainbow Farm Early' is in spear, it is in full sun. By the side of the house I have a variety of pots in the shade of the house and fence. In one of them is a 'Rainbow Farm Early' in full flower. Theses are less than 20 metres apart.
Plants can have official names and trade names that are different. Joe Sharman uses 'Ruby Baker' as a trade name but for publications the name is 'Ruby's Green Dream'.
How can that be? Surely it's a recipe for both mis-selling and confusion amongst less qualified buyers?