We hope you have enjoyed the SRGC Forum. You can make a Paypal donation to the SRGC by clicking the above button

Author Topic: Galanthus February 2008  (Read 117238 times)

Hagen Engelmann

  • treuer Schneeglöckchenfreund
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1591
  • Country: de
    • http://www.engelmannii.de
Re: Galanthus February 2008
« Reply #225 on: February 09, 2008, 06:55:18 PM »
oh, a day of light and shadows.
What are the sources of destroying?
Hagen Engelmann Brandenburg/Germany (80m) http://www.engelmannii.de]

Hans J

  • Gardener and Gourmet
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4183
  • Country: de
Re: Galanthus February 2008
« Reply #226 on: February 09, 2008, 06:59:33 PM »
Hagen :

in St.Anne's was a big fat larvae of narcissus fly .....maybe I can save this bulb
in Henry's White Lady was only one little bulb which has survived

....in all other was only labels ......bulbs complete destroyed....
"The bigger the roof damage, the better the view"(Alexandra Potter)

art600

  • Travels light, travels far
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2699
Re: Galanthus February 2008
« Reply #227 on: February 09, 2008, 07:54:46 PM »
On page 1 of this thread Paddy Tobin showed 'Anglessey Abbey'  On page 16 Anthony Darby showed a different snowdrop under this name.

I bought an 'Anglesey Abbey' at Glen Chantry on Wednesday that was like Paddy's plant.

I am not yet a galanthophile, so would like to know which plant is the true 'Anglesey Abbey'.
Arthur Nicholls

Anything bulbous    North Kent

Maggi Young

  • SRGC Hon. Vice President
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 44973
  • Country: scotland
  • "There's often a clue"
    • International Rock Gardener e-magazine
Re: Galanthus February 2008
« Reply #228 on: February 09, 2008, 08:26:13 PM »
Given the notorious capacity of galanthus to be highly variable, I would suggest that both these plants could pass as Anglesey Abbey...... from my reading on the matter... it seems that the green markings are minimal and the plant has a tendency to be poculiform with the longer inners and no markings......so both Paddy and Anthony's plants seem to fulfill the "rules" ... I use that term loosely... VERY loosely!  A search around  for photos seems to reveal a slight preponderence of those with tiny marks but a number of poculiform white flowers... so... you pays your money... and you remain utterly confused...... so, that' my rather jaundiced view on the matter...let's see if the experts agree ??!! ???
Margaret Young in Aberdeen, North East Scotland Zone 7 -ish!

Editor: International Rock Gardener e-magazine

Brian Ellis

  • Brian the Britisher
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5210
  • Country: england
  • 'Dropoholic
Re: Galanthus February 2008
« Reply #229 on: February 09, 2008, 11:03:49 PM »
You should have said hello at Glen Chantry!  Paddy's picture is the one we hope for, when I bought mine at Ashwoods there were several in pots of which only one was like this (needless to say I bought it).  I believe you may have both forms when it clumps up and it is best to select the better ones and remove the others.
Brian Ellis, Brooke, Norfolk UK. altitude 30m Mintemp -8C

art600

  • Travels light, travels far
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2699
Re: Galanthus February 2008
« Reply #230 on: February 10, 2008, 01:00:45 AM »
Brian
I chatted to Penelope, but spent most of my time in the tea room as I had my mother with me.  She is 93 and was in a wheelchair so the cold wind was not to her liking.  Even helped with the drying of the cups and saucers.
It was a great day.

I do not wish to upset Anthony, but his plant does not appear to have inners nearly the same length as outers, surely a defining feature of Anglesey Abbey.  I think it looks a good plant, but do not see how it can be Anglesaey Abbey.

Two plants I greatly admired at Glen Chantry were Bill Bishop & Little Ben, but are they not the same plant?  How do they differ?
Arthur Nicholls

Anything bulbous    North Kent

Diane Whitehead

  • Queen (of) Victoria
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1472
  • Country: ca
Re: Galanthus February 2008
« Reply #231 on: February 10, 2008, 06:48:17 AM »
I decided to see what the eBay snowdrop that sold for £123 looks like.
I found a description and photo of Clovis in Snowdrops.  It is one
of the lampshade types, like the better-known Trym, where the usual
outer petals are replaced by a second set of inner petals.  However,
Clovis does this only occasionally, and the rest of the time has a varied
combination of outers and extra inners.

I may be on my way to an eBay fortune - I just have to monitor my elwesii
with two outers and 4 inners for a few years and see if it is going to do
anything fancy. :D
« Last Edit: February 10, 2008, 06:50:57 AM by Diane Whitehead »
Diane Whitehead        Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
cool mediterranean climate  warm dry summers, mild wet winters  70 cm rain,   sandy soil

KentGardener

  • SRGC OOAgent
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2003
  • Country: gb
  • Every day's a school day
Re: Galanthus February 2008
« Reply #232 on: February 10, 2008, 07:18:34 AM »
Good luck Diane - I was so surprised at the price Clovis got.  I think it is an ugly looking plant - and if I purchase a plant for something special, I would expect it to at least behave and do it nearly every year.

I would be interested to hear what your 2 outers and 3 inners does do next year.

I was having a discussing about inners and outers yesterday to a friend.  We found various 4 outer petal plants whilst out walking.  Some had four inners and four outers,  some had only three inners and four outers.  I said that I thought the 4 inners and 4 outers would be a more stable plant over the years than the unmatched number of petals, that I thought may be a one off 'mistake'. 

Does anyone else have any thoughts on this? 

John

John

John passed away in 2017 - his posts remain here in tribute to his friendship and contribution to the forum.

Alan_b

  • 'finder of the light'
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3986
  • Country: england
Re: Galanthus February 2008
« Reply #233 on: February 10, 2008, 10:19:14 AM »
I also admired Little Ben at Glen Chantry and took a picture.  Unfortunately in this close-up you don't quite get the sense of scale.  It's a small but chunky snowdrop.

Almost in Scotland.

art600

  • Travels light, travels far
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2699
Re: Galanthus February 2008
« Reply #234 on: February 10, 2008, 10:28:50 AM »
Alan b

Did you think it closely resembled Bill Bishop?

I liked the short stem in both cases
Arthur Nicholls

Anything bulbous    North Kent

Martin Baxendale

  • Quick on the Draw
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2849
  • Country: gb
  • faster than a speeding...... snowdrop
Re: Galanthus February 2008
« Reply #235 on: February 10, 2008, 10:46:44 AM »
Bill Bishop has longer outers and a different mark - more uniformly thick and more of an upright V-shape than Little Ben. I'll take a pic of Bill Bishop this afternoon to post for comparison. My single Little Ben bulb was chipped last year so isn't flowering for me to do a side-by-side comparison.
Martin Baxendale, Gloucestershire, UK.

Brian Ellis

  • Brian the Britisher
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5210
  • Country: england
  • 'Dropoholic
Re: Galanthus February 2008
« Reply #236 on: February 10, 2008, 11:23:05 AM »
Well then I spotted you Art, if you are the chap who parked near the entrance for ease of access?  Having lost Bill Bishop and admired Little Ben I bought both!  Here then is a comparison shot, as they are both of the Mighty Atom tribe similarities are there, but I wonder if they fit Martin's
Quote
Bill Bishop has longer outers and a different mark - more uniformly thick and more of an upright V-shape than Little Ben.
I am hoping that in the ground the one on the left (Bill Bishop) will flower earlier than the one on the right (Little Ben), as they were both Wol's plants I am trusting his judgement.
Brian Ellis, Brooke, Norfolk UK. altitude 30m Mintemp -8C

art600

  • Travels light, travels far
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2699
Re: Galanthus February 2008
« Reply #237 on: February 10, 2008, 11:51:01 AM »
Brian

That was me - forgot that galanthophiles had to form an orderly queue, and arrived early.
Arthur Nicholls

Anything bulbous    North Kent

Martin Baxendale

  • Quick on the Draw
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2849
  • Country: gb
  • faster than a speeding...... snowdrop
Re: Galanthus February 2008
« Reply #238 on: February 10, 2008, 01:16:59 PM »
Brian, you should find that the outers on Bill Bishop lengthen as the flower ages. Also, the outers tend to get to their longest when the buld is settled in and growing strongly. Ones that have recently been chipped and/or potted or otherwise disturbed don't seem to get so long in the petal.

The marks in your photo look quite distinct to me. Bill bishop has a darker mark, and tends to be the same sort of thickness throughout its length - whereas Litte Ben has a paler mark, which is wider at the ends and narrower in the middle. The V mark of Bill Bishop also sometimes bleeds up a little towards the top half (or basal half) of the inner. I'm sure yours will turn out to be right.

Here's a quick pic of a fully developed flower from my garden.
Martin Baxendale, Gloucestershire, UK.

Martin Baxendale

  • Quick on the Draw
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2849
  • Country: gb
  • faster than a speeding...... snowdrop
Re: Galanthus February 2008
« Reply #239 on: February 10, 2008, 01:21:44 PM »
I was also going to say that in your pic Little Ben looks like it's fully developed and about to start going over, whereas Bill Bishop appears to be a young flower that is still developing and should still lengthen its outers more (although if it was recently potted then it might not get to its optimum length.

Also, I think it's a bit clearer in my more open flower what I mean about the colour and shape of the mark on Bill Bishop. It's a more uniform thickness and a little more upright than in Little Ben.
Martin Baxendale, Gloucestershire, UK.

 


Scottish Rock Garden Club is a Charity registered with Scottish Charity Regulator (OSCR): SC000942
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal