Snowdrops for identification, please.

[mark smyth]

The mark is wrong for St Anne's

[mark smyth]

And finally, quite a small plant this...

It looks similar to 'Armine' but I'm not sure what the leaves should look like
http://snowdropinfo.com/galanthus%20armine.html

[mark smyth]

Big Thing No Label - too tall to be a Might Atom group. I'll measure the height tomorrow

[Pauli]

I got this as G. rizehensis.
But I am not sure - the leaves look supervolute to me

[mark smyth]

I got this as G. rizehensis. But I am not sure - the leaves look supervolute to me

Definitely not rizehensis but what ever it is its a lovely snowdrop

[johnralphcarpenter]

It looks similar to 'Armine' but I'm not sure what the leaves should look like
http://snowdropinfo.com/galanthus%20armine.html

The book says 'Armine' is  "Tall, elegant-looking plant"; this one  is small and delicate.

[annew]

Big Thing No Label - too tall to be a Might Atom group. I'll measure the height tomorrow

Could be Bertram Anderson.

[annew]

Big Thing No Label - too tall to be a Might Atom group. I'll measure the height tomorrow

Could be Bertram Anderson.

[mark smyth]

I never thought about Bertram Anderson.

[mark smyth]

Thinking about it it could be Bill Bishop

[RichardW]

My Bill Bishop is a very short plant, flowers only just off the ground.

Bertram Anderson is quite tall.

[Maggi Young]

Can anyone recognise this lost name 'drop from Tom Mitchell:

[johnralphcarpenter]

I still have a few lost label clumps to identify. Any ideas on this G. elwesii?

I dug this clump up to split it and found a label fragment which reads Galanthus elwesii 'Three Leaves', so I guess that's another one identified.

[Alan_b]

I don't recognise Tom Mitchell's 'drop but it has supervolute leaves that appear to be glaucous so it must be an elwesii.  And it is what is now referred to as an 'inverse poc.' although I'm not sure if that term had been coined when 'The Book' was written.  There are so few of those that I cannot think of any at all. 

[Alan_b]

... found a label fragment which reads Galanthus elwesii 'Three Leaves', so I guess that's another one identified.

Is 'Three Leaves' actually a name or merely a description?  I doubt that something so merely descriptive would be an allowed name under current rules.