Scottish Rock Garden Club Forum

Bulbs => Galanthus => Topic started by: mark smyth on January 24, 2012, 10:12:22 PM

Title: G. plicatus Enid Bromley v Maidwell C
Post by: mark smyth on January 24, 2012, 10:12:22 PM
I probably asked this last year ... Is anyone, other than me, growing plicatus Enid Bromley and plicatus Maidwell C? How do they compare? Weather permitting I'll take comparison shots later this week.

For me Enid Bromley, growing in full shade, is the better plant always looking smart whether the flowers are open or not. It always has twin scapes.

Maybe Maidwell C, full sun, is struggling in my garden. It only has single scapes.
Title: Re: G. plicatus Enid Bromley v Maidwell C
Post by: mark smyth on January 25, 2012, 10:43:31 PM
I guess I'm the only one with Enid Bromley.

If I am I'll have to send some for twin scaling this year
Title: Re: G. plicatus Enid Bromley v Maidwell C
Post by: mark smyth on January 25, 2012, 10:59:45 PM
Just Googled Enid Bromley. All mentions are from me except one on a German site
Title: Re: G. plicatus Enid Bromley v Maidwell C
Post by: KentGardener on January 26, 2012, 05:13:03 AM
I guess I'm the only one with Enid Bromley.

If I am I'll have to send some for twin scaling this year

Hi Mark

Northgreen are selling it this year at £40.00 per bulb

But in the catalogue it is spelt "G..elwesii 'Enid Bromly'

Title: Re: G. plicatus Enid Bromley v Maidwell C
Post by: Anthony Darby on January 26, 2012, 07:50:23 AM
Well, somebody must be wrong?
Title: Re: G. plicatus Enid Bromley v Maidwell C
Post by: Brian Ellis on January 26, 2012, 09:11:09 AM
I guess I'm the only one with Enid Bromley.

If I am I'll have to send some for twin scaling this year

Well Margaret Owen may have one ;)
Title: Re: G. plicatus Enid Bromley v Maidwell C
Post by: mark smyth on January 26, 2012, 10:04:57 AM
Mine are definitely plicate
Title: Re: G. plicatus Enid Bromley v Maidwell C
Post by: snowdropman on January 26, 2012, 02:08:56 PM
Well, somebody must be wrong?
John Morley has been listing it in his catalogue as an elwesii, I bought it direct from David Bromley at the 2009 Gala, when he sold it as plain G. 'Enid Bromley' and I understand that Matt Bishop has provisionally classified it as G. plicatus 'Enid Bromley' – no doubt MB will make clear in due course.

There is also a typo in JM's 2012 catalogue, which says 'Enid Bromly' instead of 'Enid Bromley' and I have a note that it may also previously have been circulated as ‘Mrs Enid Bromley’
Title: Re: G. plicatus Enid Bromley v Maidwell C
Post by: mark smyth on January 26, 2012, 02:48:14 PM
Thanks
Title: Re: G. plicatus Enid Bromley v Maidwell C
Post by: mark smyth on January 27, 2012, 12:17:44 AM
Chris do you think Enid Bromley and Maidwell C are the same plant? Both have a pale green leaf edge, both are plicate and have the same mark.
Title: Re: G. plicatus Enid Bromley v Maidwell C
Post by: snowdropman on January 27, 2012, 08:21:05 AM
Chris do you think Enid Bromley and Maidwell C are the same plant? Both have a pale green leaf edge, both are plicate and have the same mark.
Sorry Mark, I sent my 'Enid Bromley' off to be twin-scaled in 2009, so have not had a chance to compare it with ‘Maidwell C’ - as Brian hinted earlier in this thread, you might want to compare notes with Margaret Owen - 'Enid Bromley' was discovered in her garden, so she might be able to throw some light on it.
Title: Re: G. plicatus Enid Bromley v Maidwell C
Post by: mark smyth on January 27, 2012, 10:18:33 AM
I got my original bulb from Margaret O.
Title: Re: G. plicatus Enid Bromley v Maidwell C
Post by: mark smyth on February 03, 2012, 10:16:36 PM
Enid Bromley.

Thanks goes to the lurker who sent me photos
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal