Scottish Rock Garden Club Forum

Plant Identification => Plant Identification Questions and Answers => Topic started by: JohnnyD on May 10, 2015, 10:16:24 AM

Title: Is the label correct?
Post by: JohnnyD on May 10, 2015, 10:16:24 AM
This smashing little plant, labelled Androsace albana, has come back for at least its' third year, even though A.albana is said to be annual or biennial.
Can anyone confirm it's true identity please?
JohnnyD
Title: Re: Is the label correct?
Post by: ArdfearnAli on May 10, 2015, 10:32:00 AM
Looks very similar to what I have as Androsace semperviviodes. I also grew from seed a couple of years ago a plant listed as  Draba rigida which has turned out to be Androsace rigida wich is similar as well.

Alasdair
Title: Re: Is the label correct?
Post by: Maggi Young on May 10, 2015, 10:51:17 AM
Not the correct foliage for A. albana - see this photo from David Nicholson in the forum

[attachimg=2]

....this from the forum, by Josef Lemmens :
[attachimg=3]

and this from Zdenek Rehacek's  (http://www.zrehacek-alpines.cz) site
[attachimg=1]
 
Title: Re: Is the label correct?
Post by: JohnnyD on May 10, 2015, 11:44:28 AM
Ask a question and sixteen minutes later comes the right answer. Brilliant. Thanks Ali and Maggi.
J.
Title: Re: Is the label correct?
Post by: Michael J Campbell on May 10, 2015, 11:44:37 AM
Looks a bit like Androsace himalaica but hard to tell from picture.
Title: Re: Is the label correct?
Post by: Lesley Cox on May 10, 2015, 09:40:46 PM
I don't think it is A sempervivoides anyway, which, in my experience is always a deep pink and the rosettes very tight and compact, making a good cushion. I have two forms one with greyer rosettes and slighter more lavender flowers (but still pink) and the other greener, a little larger in all parts and the flowers a rich almost vulgar, sugar pink. Both excellent plants. Here is the latter but not showing the flowers to advantage.
Title: Re: Is the label correct?
Post by: Tim Ingram on May 11, 2015, 06:13:44 AM
A. himalaicawas my first thought too and it certainly fits the description in Duncan Lowe and George Smith's book - and himalaica was first described as a form of sempervivoides. Had this once and must grow it again - it looks a super plant in that scree. (albana doesn't look bad either - great picture from Jozef Lemmens).
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal