Scottish Rock Garden Club Forum

General Subjects => General Forum => Topic started by: ranunculus on February 10, 2009, 01:39:02 PM

Title: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 10, 2009, 01:39:02 PM
Last evening members of the East Lancashire Group of the Alpine Garden Society held their second annual digital photographic competition and we were delighted to receive 167 superb entries from 12 enthusiastic exhibitors in 8 individual classes.
Rules were few - classes were broad - and the audience seemed to enjoy their roles as unpaid judges.  Each image was allotted seven seconds of screen exposure and, with some classes boasting over 25 entries, selecting a winner in each class was never going to be an easy task. 

Classes were kept deliberately loose e.g.

1)  For a digital image of an alpine plant in a garden setting

2)  For a digital image of an alpine plant in the wild

3)  For a digital image close-up or macro shot of an alpine plant

4)  For a digital image of any garden featuring alpine plants

5)  For a digital image of any mountain or alpine setting from the wild with or without alpine plants

6)  For a digital image taken at an AGS or SRGC Show

7)  For a digital image of an animal, insect or bird - taken in the garden or in the wild, but not necessarily in a mountain environment.

8)  For a computer enhanced image of alpine plants - let your imagination run free.

    and the rules simply insisted that:-

 Exhibitors must be paid-up members of the East Lancashire Group

 Maximum of three entries per exhibitor per class

 Images must have been taken by (or for Class 8 - enhanced by) the exhibitor

 Entries to be received by a set date


Many thanks to all the exhibitors and congratulations to the winners ... I will attempt to post a few images over the days to come.



Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Lesley Cox on February 10, 2009, 08:06:59 PM
Maybe something similar on an annual basis for this very Forum? Mmm? Without going to the extreme lengths of so many individual classes as the AGS Online show.
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 10, 2009, 08:17:23 PM
In pursuit of nothing more than a matter of interest I will post the 17 entries for Class One (obviously scaled down in size).

CLASS ONE : For a digital image of an alpine plant captured in a garden setting.
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 10, 2009, 08:21:58 PM
Second batch from Class One ...
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Anthony Darby on February 10, 2009, 08:48:16 PM
I like no. 11. 8)
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Maggi Young on February 10, 2009, 08:56:01 PM
nos 7, 1 and 5, in that order!
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Gunilla on February 10, 2009, 09:01:37 PM
No 10 is my choice!
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Lvandelft on February 10, 2009, 09:08:50 PM
I like nr. 11, but silly question: what is it?
Nr. 12 looks more like work than hobby.. ;D ;D
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: maggiepie on February 10, 2009, 09:24:51 PM
I like number 10, it makes me want to go and explore the rest of the garden. ;D
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Diane Clement on February 10, 2009, 09:31:39 PM
I like nr. 11, but silly question: what is it? 

Ismene amancaes - used to be Hymenocallis amancaes  (not exactly an alpine ::) )

Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Anthony Darby on February 10, 2009, 09:36:06 PM
Must Google it and look for bulbs.  8)
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Anthony Darby on February 10, 2009, 09:39:39 PM
Crumbs, even B & T World Seeds don't have it. :(
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 10, 2009, 09:46:02 PM
You are spot on, Diane (as usual) ... perhaps it may have been 'Not as schedule', but not in our friendly regime!   ;D 
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Lvandelft on February 10, 2009, 10:06:42 PM
I like nr. 11, but silly question: what is it? 
Ismene amancaes - used to be Hymenocallis amancaes  (not exactly an alpine ::) )
Thank you Diane.
I expected something like Ismene, but never seen this yellow one myself.
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Lesley Cox on February 10, 2009, 10:29:11 PM
I rather like the white Campanula. Were these judged on the plant or on the image Cliff?
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Paddy Tobin on February 10, 2009, 11:33:03 PM
7, 9, 17 get my votes.

Paddy
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: vivienr on February 10, 2009, 11:45:16 PM
I love the snowdrop pic because it is taken at a different angle - not the usual one for identification purposes.

I don't know anything about alpines but the Irises are pretty. Are all irises alpines?

Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 11, 2009, 03:04:38 PM
Hi Vivien,
Welcome to the forum.  No, not all irises are alpines, in the same way that not all buttercups, not all rhododendrons and not all primroses are.  There are alpine species in a veritable host of different genera and their natural habitats (among a host of other criteria) decree whether they are 'alpine' or not.  The broadcaster, Geoffrey Smith stated that, in his opinion, 'alpines could encompass any plant that would not look out of place in a rock garden' and, for lack of a brief, but technically accurate substitute, I would suggest you try to use this as a reasonable rule of thumb.  Many species of iris are, in fact, too tall, too stately and/or too fragile to contemplate planting in a rock garden situation.  They would look as out of place as a palm tree, a pumpkin or a purple sprouting pinyon.
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ichristie on February 11, 2009, 03:45:25 PM
Hi Cliff, thanks for the great pictures, one plant each please.  cheers Ian the Christie kind
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 11, 2009, 04:15:53 PM
Were these judged on the plant or on the image Cliff?

Thanks Ian, Lesley et al,
All the way through the competition I kept urging them to try to concentrate on the best photograph, but some of them still swayed unerringly towards the unusual plants ... the 'gardener' coming out in them obviously!
We also suggested that exhibitors (and their partners) might wish to vote for any but their own images and this seems to have worked very well.
It all made for a very interesting evening and feedback was very encouraging - such a shame that only 42 members could make it to the hall on such a potentially snowy evening.
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Anthony Darby on February 11, 2009, 06:25:51 PM
Hi Cliff, thanks for the great pictures, one plant each please.  cheers Ian the Christie kind
I thought you always tried to persuade punters to buy three of everything Ian? ;D
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 12, 2009, 08:50:14 PM

CLASS TWO : For a digital image of an alpine plant in the wild

25 Entries

PLEASE REMEMBER : IT IS A PHOTOGRAPHIC CONTEST AND NOT AN ALPINE SHOW


Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 12, 2009, 08:55:14 PM
CLASS TWO continued ...
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: maggiepie on February 12, 2009, 08:57:22 PM
Oh wow, 2-16, Fabulous!! ;D
Also love 2-11.
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Paddy Tobin on February 12, 2009, 08:57:45 PM
Cliff,

I reckon 2 and 10 are yours?

Paddy
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 12, 2009, 08:59:21 PM
CLASS TWO continued ...
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 12, 2009, 09:15:36 PM
RESULTS FOR CLASS ONE were:-

FIRST           9
SECOND       7
THIRD=       17
THIRD=       14
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Maggi Young on February 12, 2009, 09:41:53 PM
An interesting choice, Cliff, because if one sticks to the brief, then No. 10is the onew hich most cloesely follows that... the others might, really, have been taken anywhere, though they are super photos..... now to see what happens with the following classes!  :-\
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Diane Clement on February 12, 2009, 09:47:40 PM
2.7 is a superb plant - but I can smell it from here!
and 2.14, it's nice to guess who's been where on their holidays
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Maggi Young on February 12, 2009, 09:49:28 PM
Quote
CLASS TWO : For a digital image of an alpine plant in the wild

Your lot do get about, don't they? Travel agents must be happy in East Lancs!! ;D


2.15 and 2.16 remind me of Lawrence Greenwood paintings... perfect compositions with lovely  backgrounds  :D
...great photos, but do they show enough habitat?
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Maggi Young on February 12, 2009, 09:56:17 PM
Quote
2.7 is a superb plant - but I can smell it from here!


Yes, Diane, I thought it was the dog  :P
Polemoniums are rather on the stinky side ....pity really  :'(
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Diane Clement on February 12, 2009, 10:01:52 PM
Yes, Diane, I thought it was the dog  :P
Polemoniums are rather on the stinky side ....pity really  :'( 

I can put up with it, for that show of flowers.  I keep losing mine. 
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Anthony Darby on February 12, 2009, 10:21:18 PM
Fantastic pics. 2.11 looks like Cypripedium montanum, which is notoriously difficult in the garden?
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Lesley Cox on February 13, 2009, 01:06:13 AM
That is an amazing Polemonium. I've just ordered seed from Ron Ratko. I can bear it if it smalls like the dog. After all, I can bear the dog smelling like the dog. :)

I'm inclined to agree that the pictures with a lot of habitat/background are the best, according to schedule, as it were.

What is the plant in 2-19 please?
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: fermi de Sousa on February 13, 2009, 04:20:05 AM
What is the plant in 2-19 please?
It looks suspiciously like winter heliotrope, Petasites fragrans ???
But perhaps it's another less invasive species?
cheers
fermi
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 13, 2009, 06:59:21 AM
Fantastic pics. 2.11 looks like Cypripedium montanum, which is notoriously difficult in the garden?

It is extremely difficult, Anthony, though it is only fair to point out that this class is for images captured in the wild. (In this case; the Wallowa Mountains of Oregon).
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 13, 2009, 07:06:54 AM
What is the plant in 2-19 please?
It looks suspiciously like winter heliotrope, Petasites fragrans ???
But perhaps it's another less invasive species?
cheers
fermi

This exhibit was untitled, but is certainly a petasites species (possibly fragrans) ... from the same contributor who exhibited the Ismene in Class One.
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Diane Clement on February 13, 2009, 08:33:35 AM
That is an amazing Polemonium. I've just ordered seed from Ron Ratko. I can bear it if it smalls like the dog. After all, I can bear the dog smelling like the dog. :) 

I've just sown it (P viscosum) from Ratko, as I have the last few years.  It germinates fine, grows on fine, but never any flowers? I've once seen a good pot in cultivation - probably Alan Furness, although it wasn't as tight as the wild specimen.   
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Anthony Darby on February 13, 2009, 08:46:33 AM
Fantastic pics. 2.11 looks like Cypripedium montanum, which is notoriously difficult in the garden?

It is extremely difficult, Anthony, though it is only fair to point out that this class is for images captured in the wild. (In this case; the Wallowa Mountains of Oregon).
They are all beautifully taken. Thanks Cliff, as I think it extremely useful to see what makes a good picture.
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ian mcenery on February 13, 2009, 09:20:49 AM
2.14, it's nice to guess who's been where on their holidays

2.2 looks familiar to me
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 13, 2009, 09:43:04 AM
2.14, it's nice to guess who's been where on their holidays

2.2 looks familiar to me

It probably will again in late June, Ian ... especially if you hire a car while you are there?   :D
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 13, 2009, 01:20:17 PM
RESULTS FROM CLASS TWO

FIRST           16       Congratulations JohnnyD!!!
SECOND=     10
SECOND=     14
THIRD=        A FEW EXHIBITS
       
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 14, 2009, 05:07:35 PM
CLASS THREE    For a digital image close-up or macro shot of an alpine plant

TWENTY SEVEN ENTRIES
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 14, 2009, 05:11:48 PM
CLASS THREE continued ...
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 14, 2009, 05:25:47 PM
CLASS THREE continued ...
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: maggiepie on February 14, 2009, 06:35:38 PM
I like 3-7 best. :)
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Lesley Cox on February 14, 2009, 09:04:45 PM
7, 20 and 21 for me. Is 20 a Lantana? or what?
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Gunilla on February 14, 2009, 09:16:19 PM
I like 7 and 5 and 21 and....

I also like the plant on number 22 but what is it?
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Anthony Darby on February 14, 2009, 09:34:23 PM
Is 20 a Lantana? or what?
I'd suggest it's a what Lesley. ::) Lantana is a tropical bush with yellow, orange, pink or purple flowers that produces poisonous black berries. It is used in butterfly houses as a nectar source and also as bedding in summer.
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Gunilla on February 14, 2009, 09:48:59 PM
Is 20 a Lantana? or what?
I'd guess Lantana.
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 14, 2009, 10:08:17 PM
Sorry, only just got back from a lecture date ... yes, it is a lantana (should be 'not as schedule', of course - but we are tremendously lenient in Lancashire)!!!
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Anthony Darby on February 14, 2009, 11:25:47 PM
I need specs? Here is a link to Lantana camara.
http://images.google.co.uk/images?hl=en&q=lantana&um=1&ie=UTF-8&ei=iVKXSYmwN6TEjAeblNjiAQ&sa=X&oi=image_result_group&resnum=4&ct=title
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 16, 2009, 02:37:16 PM
RESULTS FROM CLASS THREE

FIRST       12
SECOND     7
THIRD=     9
THIRD=    11
THIRD=    21


CLASS FOUR WILL FOLLOW AS SOON AS POSSIBLE
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: gote on February 16, 2009, 05:25:27 PM
They are quite good photos in many ways but I am puzzled.  ???
Two of the winners were Iris sibirica and Lilium pardalinum. Alpines?? 
They are not potatoes but I.s. is something I have in the herbaceous border and L.p. is a woodlander in my garden.
OK they are "alpinier" than hymenocallis. :-\
Comments anyone please.
Göte.
PS
I enclose a picture of Lilium amoenum. I like this picture and would enter it in a competition for "Woodlanders" or "Species plants" but I would feel discouraged to enter it as "alpine"
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 16, 2009, 06:40:24 PM
Good evening Gote,
I feel I must answer your query and reassure you that we do understand your puzzlement.
Our alpine garden society group is made up of experts, novices, enthusiasts and general gardeners, so entries to any competition that we stage will reflect this diversity of knowledge and interest.  Like many groups of this type we are eager to encourage the novice and to cherish the enthusiastic.  We welcome entries from all our members and would be loathe to refuse or deny anyone the chance to exhibit their lovely photographs.  Results 'usually' tend to reflect the sum of our knowledge, but occasionally the joint decision is slightly out of line with the views of the erudite. We accept these anomalies and appreciate all our entries. Members are much harder to keep when they feel their efforts have not been appreciated.   
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Luc Gilgemyn on February 16, 2009, 08:08:42 PM
I think this is a very wise attitude and approach Cliff !   8)
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: maggiepie on February 16, 2009, 09:09:31 PM
Göte, what a beautiful lilium.
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: JohnnyD on February 17, 2009, 08:54:40 AM
Hi Gote,
Involved as I am with the East lancs Group (currently as 'recycled' vice-chairman), I heartily endorse the views expressed by Cliff - with one addition.
The definition of alpine has always been rather vague - especially when it comes to showing.
The best definition in that respect seems to be that anything which will survive in the garden or alpine house, and can be transported to a show without being totally overwhelming, will be acceptable under the 'alpine' definition - especially at the novice stage.
The official definition covers all plants which are suited to a 'medium sized rockery', - which in turn needs further definition as to what we each regard as 'medium sized'. This certainly includes many 'woodlanders' and plants which would be at home in the border.
I am much happier to accept that Cliffs brilliantly conceived and organised photo show is an expression of the whole group and, as such, will show huge breadth of interest.
While there are certainly some entries which would be regarded as NERCTS ( Not Even Remotely Close To Schedule ::)), the effect of the exercise was the quietest and most attentive audience I think I have ever seen, and the proportion of that audience who commented on a super evening was the highest ever.
As for wider interest - just wait until you see the eventual winner! :o.  I am sure you will be impressed.

JohnnyD.
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Gunilla on February 17, 2009, 09:33:23 AM
I have enjoyed all the photos very much.  I also like the idea of a competition with generous rules that encourages both experts and novices to participate. 
I still have one question though.  What is the name of the plant on photo 3-22 ?  I haven't got a clue.
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 17, 2009, 09:57:10 AM
Good morning Gunilla,
Many thanks for your very kind comments.
When I was giving a commentary to the images as they appeared on the screen I realised that this image (3-22) was untitled ... I very hastily referred to it as a scilla species ... that was the only thing that sprang to mind?
May I also compliment you on your choice of avatar ... by far the friendliest face on the forum!!!

Hi JohnnyD. 
Many thanks for your very supportive posting.


CLASS FOUR

For a digital image of any garden featuring alpine plants

SEVENTEEN ENTRIES
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 17, 2009, 10:00:29 AM
CLASS FOUR continued ...
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Gunilla on February 17, 2009, 10:42:08 AM
When I was giving a commentary to the images as they appeared on the screen I realised that this image (3-22) was untitled ... I very hastily referred to it as a scilla species ... that was the only thing that sprang to mind?

Thanks for your answer, Cliff.  I'm sure it's not a scilla species.  Could it be some kind of Polygala maybe  ???
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Luc Gilgemyn on February 17, 2009, 10:46:26 AM
Class four is a real treat Cliff !
Very nice to see all these gardens - a lot of them could (should) have entered the AGS on-line show !!
Nr 13 is awesome !!
Thanks for taking the trouble to show all these Cliff !
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 17, 2009, 11:00:34 AM
Hi Gunilla,
I suspect the plant in question MAY be of South African origin ... I know the exhibitor has travelled there. I will try to find out for you.


Many thanks, Luc ... I am so glad that you are enjoying our little competition.
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Anthony Darby on February 17, 2009, 11:16:44 AM
I agree with Luc. What a superb display in that alpine house. 8)
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: maggiepie on February 17, 2009, 11:21:03 AM
Fantastic pics, I like them all!
 4-8, are they all Rhododendrons?
Gorgeous!!! :) :) :)
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Maggi Young on February 17, 2009, 12:05:33 PM
4-8 are all Rhodos, Helen... aren't they lovely?!!

3-22 might  be a veronica but I suspect a Polygala ....the scale is deceptive, I think.

What a super show and what an entertaining evening it must have been .... loking forward to more..??
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: gote on February 17, 2009, 12:58:05 PM
I really DO appreciate the view that newcomers should be encouraged and I DO think that most of these pictures are excellent and worthy of being shown. I Do think that people should be commended for their efforts. I am glad that they are posted. 
On the other hand I think that the word 'alpine' should have a meaning just like most words have. If I were conteplating to send in a picture to a competition in the class "Closeups of an alpine plant". I would not send the picture of Lilium amoenum but restrict myself to pictures of plants that grow in exposed rocky areas. If the winning picture were a woodland Lilium I would consider myself unfairly treated.
A simple way to eat the cake and still have it would be to amend the description of the class so it indicated what really is accepted as an entry.
Göte

Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Gunilla on February 17, 2009, 01:01:40 PM
4-7  is fantastic. It's like looking into a magic garden.
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: gote on February 17, 2009, 01:43:06 PM
A question of a different kind.
How do you exhibit these pictures?
When it comes to digital pictures a lot of difference comes from the printer you use.
Göte
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 17, 2009, 01:59:29 PM
Hi Gote,
The images are displayed/projected onto a large screen via a digital projector.  I have utilised Keynote (Mac) technology to ensure that each image is displayed on screen for exactly seven seconds and then all images in each class are displayed on (as many as necessary) multi-image screens for easy comparison.  It involves a lot of work to set up the presentation initially but hopefully each successive competition will become easier to manage.  I have slotted in class description screens and interesting transitions between photographs - a musical introduction and voting procedure screens complete the presentation.
in addition I am able to move the eight class winners into another short presentation to decide the 'Best in Show'.
At the end of the judging I present the entire thing again with exhibitors names added and with the display time reduced to four seconds for each image.
Please don't ask how long this takes to set up - 167 images in total - I must be mad!!!

I will give thought to your suggestion about class descriptions - this may still prove a minefield!
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: JohnnyD on February 17, 2009, 02:10:21 PM
I suspect 3-22 is a very good spike of Polygala vulgaris.
J.
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 17, 2009, 02:21:18 PM
Hi John,
Still not absolutely certain?
There is very good representation of Polygala vulgaris as I would recognise it, at the following link:-

http://www.lucianabartolini.net/Immagini/fiori3/polygala-vulgaris-2.jpg
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Tony Willis on February 17, 2009, 02:30:02 PM
Gote

in your post re the use of the word 'alpine' I feel you have raised a point that occurs all the time. Both our major societies use either the word 'Alpine' or 'Rock' in their names and yet many of the classes at the shows have plants that have no connection with either. This also applies to the articles in the journals. Looking at the definition in the show schedules brings up the word 'hardy' and yet many of the plants exhibited would not survive the mildest frost and are grown in heated greenhouses(e.g. cyclamen persicum). In defence I would say that both the shows and the journals would be much depleted if this definition was used in the true meaning and it is I think an impossible one to square if we are to keep our hobby as embracing as possible
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: JohnnyD on February 17, 2009, 03:04:14 PM
I wish I could put things as well as that! :-\

Cheers Tony.
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Lesley Cox on February 17, 2009, 07:33:52 PM
I think it is Scilla bifolia, in bud mostly. The foliage apparently with it belongs to something else and the scilla is emerging through it. Its own foliage is visible to the left.
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Maggi Young on February 17, 2009, 07:40:00 PM
Here is photo 3-22 again....
 I'm sure it is a Polygala......
[attach=1]
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Gunilla on February 17, 2009, 08:16:42 PM
Yes I think it is, Maggi.  :) Thanks. I first got the impression that it was a bigger plant. 
Lesley, I love all kinds of scilla and try to grow as many as I can get my hands on. It was the fact that the buds resembled scilla that drew my attention to the photo in the first place.
Scilla bifolia
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Lesley Cox on February 17, 2009, 09:12:09 PM
Oh well, I'd better retire from this one. Bloodied but unbowed. ::)
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 17, 2009, 09:19:30 PM
RESULTS FOR CLASS FOUR

FIRST     11
SECOND   8
THIRD      7

CLASS FIVE SOON.
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Paddy Tobin on February 17, 2009, 09:22:29 PM
Goodness, Cliff, these competitions certainly mean a lot of work for you. I hope it was appreciated by those who entered and those who viewed.

Certainly the images were enjoyed here.

Paddy
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 17, 2009, 10:10:11 PM
Many thanks Paddy.

CLASS FIVE

For a digital image of any mountain or alpine setting from the wild with or without alpine plants

TWENTY NINE ENTRIES
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 17, 2009, 10:14:32 PM
CLASS FIVE continued
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: maggiepie on February 17, 2009, 10:18:47 PM
4-8 are all Rhodos, Helen... aren't they lovely?!!


Yes they are Maggi, this forum is a very dangerous place!! :o
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 17, 2009, 10:20:09 PM
CLASS FIVE continued
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: maggiepie on February 17, 2009, 10:27:32 PM
Oh, 5-21 is unreal  ;D ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Paddy Tobin on February 17, 2009, 11:19:08 PM
Another lovely set, Cliff and, if I am not mistaken 5-21 could very well be one of Cliff's own photographs. It certainly is from the Dolomites.

Paddy
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Lesley Cox on February 18, 2009, 12:21:19 AM
In 5-21 I'm very surprized not to see an image of the Booker carved into the stone fave of the mountain. Any candidates for someone to accompany him. No Americans, they have their own.
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 18, 2009, 07:34:25 AM
Good morning all,
Whilst this stunning image (5-21) is certainly captured in the Dolomites, Sue and I have NOT been the only visitors to these magical mountains from the East Lancashire group!
Forum member JohnnyD has also led wildflower walks for Collett's Mountain Holidays and this particular image is one of his.  I must admit that I felt an overwhelming sense of deja vu when I encountered John's lovely shot ... attached are John's entry for the competition and one of mine captured a couple of seasons ago.
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: JohnnyD on February 18, 2009, 12:35:19 PM
What Cliff doesn't tell you is that the shots are taken from the terrace of a restaurant/bar at the end of a super walk among the flowers.
The fact they are both in focus is testimony to the fact that they were also taken BEFORE the beers! ;D
JohnnyD
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: maggiepie on February 18, 2009, 12:35:56 PM
  I must admit that I felt an overwhelming sense of deja vu when I encountered John's lovely shot ... attached are John's entry for the competition and one of mine captured a couple of seasons ago.


No wonder  :)
I really love these pics.
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 18, 2009, 12:50:12 PM
Hi Helen,
It is quite possible to stand at that particular spot and take twenty or more images of comparable beauty simply by moving the camera left or right by a few degrees.
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Maggi Young on February 18, 2009, 12:54:38 PM
What Cliff doesn't tell you is that the shots are taken from the terrace of a restaurant/bar at the end of a super walk among the flowers.
The fact they are both in focus is testimony to the fact that they were also taken BEFORE the beers! ;D
JohnnyD

 yeah, yeah, that'll be right..... we all know that digital cameras can mange a decent shot  even if the photographer is three sheets to the wind...... ::) :P ;D ;D ;)



 (which does rather beg the question as to why I have such fuzzy pix when I'm stone cold sober  :-[ :-\ :'(      )
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 18, 2009, 12:57:58 PM
What Cliff doesn't tell you is that the shots are taken from the terrace of a restaurant/bar at the end of a super walk among the flowers.
The fact they are both in focus is testimony to the fact that they were also taken BEFORE the beers! ;D
JohnnyDyeah, yeah, that'll be right..... we all know that digital cameras can mange a decent shot  even if the photographer is three sheets to the wind...... ::) :P ;D ;D ;)
 (which does rather beg the question as to why I have such fuzzy pix when I'm stone cold sober  :-[ :-\ :'(     

delirium tremens ????    ;D
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Maggi Young on February 18, 2009, 01:03:51 PM
Quote
which does rather beg the question as to why I have such fuzzy pix when I'm stone cold sober
Quote
delirium tremens   ???

Could be... it's hard to munch chocolate bars and hold the camera at the same time........ ::)
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: maggiepie on February 18, 2009, 01:04:43 PM
Hi Helen,
It is quite possible to stand at that particular spot and take twenty or more images of comparable beauty simply by moving the camera left or right by a few degrees.

Sounds like they picked the right spot to build a restaurant.
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 18, 2009, 02:09:41 PM
Just to labour a point a little, Helen ... all taken in the immediate vicinity ... and the flowers aren't bad when you can take your eyes off the mountains! Apologies for the cable car wires in the background ...  :)

Dolomites scenes
Dolomite meadow
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: JohnnyD on February 18, 2009, 02:28:18 PM
Brilliant last pic Cliff - we should do something about that cable car. ;D
J.
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: maggiepie on February 18, 2009, 03:26:21 PM
Thanks for the extra pics Cliff, it is certainly an amazing area.
How our lives have been enriched by the advent of affordable digital cameras.  :)
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: shelagh on February 18, 2009, 07:59:19 PM
Brings back happy memories Cliff.  Any pics of Route 22 about?
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 18, 2009, 08:29:03 PM
Thanks Shelagh ... I will have to check re: route 22!!


RESULTS FOR CLASS FIVE

FIRST        21    Congratulations JohnnyD.
SECOND    27
THIRD        6

CLASS 6 WILL FOLLOW SHORTLY
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: JohnnyD on February 18, 2009, 10:45:37 PM
I can still taste that beer. :P
Still can't remember the name of the mountain - it really was good beer.

This is just to reinforce Cliffs observation about the stunning scenery at that spot. Even the bar looks good. ;D

JohnnyD
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: JohnnyD on February 18, 2009, 10:47:22 PM
This is the pic which should have been on the last post.  Drat! >:(
pic edited by M....  
[attach=1]
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: JohnnyD on February 18, 2009, 10:48:44 PM
Do me a favour again Maggi - still can't get the size right. Must try harder!

JohnnyD


 My pleasure , Johnny.....   Maggi   ;D
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 19, 2009, 06:25:39 AM
Re: the mystery plant in Class Three ... (3/22) ...

From the exhibitors own hand -  'Taken on 25/4/06 in Hungary, the Narodney Park & Valley.   I might get a
closer venue with research.   The day I also saw a Europea Lynx which was
much more memorable for me'!!!

Hope this might help?
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Gunilla on February 19, 2009, 08:56:05 AM
Good morning Cliff,
Thank you very much. You have been most kind. I'm sure now it is a Polygala.
I just heard on the radio that tracks of two Lynx have been found in the south of Sweden. They are beautiful animals and it certainly must be really something to see one live.
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: JohnnyD on February 19, 2009, 09:01:54 AM
Hi Shelagh,
I am sure I can find a lot of slides from Route 22 - but they will need to be scanned.
I suggest it may require a new thread perhaps titled 'Alpine Torture' or something similar. (Explanation to follow! ??? ???)
See what I can do.
JohnnyD

p.s. Here's one to be going on with. :D
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 19, 2009, 09:39:10 AM
Many thanks, Gunilla ... glad to be of service.  :)

Shelagh and JohnnyD,
I would be a little wary about making TOO much of the trials and tribulations of route 22 on this forum ... we have members in New Zealand (and elsewhere, I suspect) who think nothing of ascending near vertical tussock-clad mountains for many hours at a time (in day-glow lycra tights and disintegrating boots) just to reach the start of an exhausting flower hunting expedition!!! 
A brief stroll in the Dollies might seem a little tame?   ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: JohnnyD on February 19, 2009, 10:04:23 AM
Brief stroll!!!!!!!!!! :o   Just ask Shelagh. :P (And me come to think of it.)

JohnnyD
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: shelagh on February 19, 2009, 02:42:36 PM
I think the worst moment was when we were just feeling pleasantly weary and ready for heading downwards, the signs on the fence ahead pointed Left for one route, Right for another and a vertical arrow up and over the top of another big pointy thing for Route 22.  It was a killer cos I crawled into bed just as Brian headed out the door for dinner.  Anyone who knows me knows I
never[move]miss a meal.
[/b][/move] ;D
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 19, 2009, 08:00:10 PM
CLASS SIX

For a digital image taken at an AGS or SRGC Show

SIXTEEN ENTRIES

Please remember ... it is not a plant competition ... it is a photographic competition.
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 19, 2009, 08:03:08 PM
CLASS SIX continued ...
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Lesley Cox on February 19, 2009, 08:21:44 PM
6-10 and 6-2 win for me
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: maggiepie on February 19, 2009, 09:43:42 PM
6-1 and 6-11 for me, but if I could walk home with one of those plants it would be the Clematis Tenuiloba  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Maggi Young on February 19, 2009, 09:47:45 PM
I'm voting for 6-2 because it shows the plants well and also gives a good flavour of a show bench.

For stuffing up my jumper and running off with... it's the Physoplexis comosum 6-6  ;D

Clematis tenuiloba is fab too, but my jumper isn't THAT big..... ;)
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: maggiepie on February 19, 2009, 09:50:38 PM


For stuffing up my jumper and running off with... it's the Physoplexis comosum 6-6  ;D

Clematis tenuiloba is fab too, but my jumper isn't THAT big..... ;)

Maggi, I could fit both of them,  I have baggy jumpers, and would look even haha!! ;D
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Maggi Young on February 19, 2009, 09:54:48 PM


For stuffing up my jumper and running off with... it's the Physoplexis comosum 6-6  ;D

Clematis tenuiloba is fab too, but my jumper isn't THAT big..... ;)

Maggi, I could fit both of them,  I have baggy jumpers, and would look even haha!! ;D


Good thinking there, Helen..... the makings of a fine criminal mastermind, I think.
I too have baggy jumpers, sadly I am also very baggy so there isn't so much free space as most of it is already me    :-[ :-\ :-X
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: maggiepie on February 19, 2009, 10:06:02 PM
Good thinking there, Helen..... the makings of a fine criminal mastermind, I think.
I too have baggy jumpers, sadly I am also very baggy so there isn't so much free space as most of it is already me    :-[ :-\ :-X

Maggi, I suspect those little darlings are chained to the wrists of the owners!! ( or maybe a GPS in the pots) :o :o :o

Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 19, 2009, 10:09:51 PM
Here in East Lancashire we employ a Chief Inspector of baggy jumpers ... there is a four year waiting list for the position!!!   ;)
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: maggiepie on February 19, 2009, 10:22:46 PM
Here in East Lancashire we employ a Chief Inspector of baggy jumpers ... there is a four year waiting list for the position!!!   ;)

I have to ask, are you on the list Cliff? :-X :-X
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Lesley Cox on February 19, 2009, 10:53:54 PM
I suppose the CI has to say "what's up yours?" or "I want to see up yours." The reply would be just "up yours." :o
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 20, 2009, 08:32:58 AM
Here in East Lancashire we employ a Chief Inspector of baggy jumpers ... there is a four year waiting list for the position!!!   ;)

I have to ask, are you on the list Cliff? :-X :-X

I'm third in line behind Brian 'Warm Hands' Smethurst and Johnny 'I'm behind you' Dower.  The current inspector; who must remain anonymous in case his partner finds out, is currently serving twelve months at her Majesty's pleasure!  (Didn't even know she wore sweaters).   ;D
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Luc Gilgemyn on February 20, 2009, 08:41:20 AM
 ;D ;D ;D

Clearly beaten by the jumper jokes - 6-9 is my favourite !
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 20, 2009, 09:29:56 PM
CLASS SIX RESULTS

FIRST       5
SECOND   6
THIRD      3


CLASS SEVEN TO FOLLOW SHORTLY
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 20, 2009, 10:03:07 PM
CLASS SEVEN

For a digital image of an animal, insect or bird - taken in the garden or in the wild, but not necessarily in a mountain environment.

TWENTY SIX ENTRIES

The competition is for photography and not for rarity of subject matter.
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 20, 2009, 10:07:37 PM
CLASS SEVEN continued ...
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 20, 2009, 10:11:00 PM
CLASS SEVEN continued ...
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: maggiepie on February 20, 2009, 10:44:31 PM
I was all for 7-5 until I saw the terns flying in tandem ( think they are terns)
7-19 for me, fantastic pic, it looks like their movements  have been choreographed ;D ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Carlo on February 20, 2009, 10:45:09 PM
Hey Cliff...it's 7-19 in a LANDSLIDE...I want to know about how this one was captured...
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Carlo on February 20, 2009, 10:46:01 PM
and Maggie's correct...they are terns.
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Gunilla on February 21, 2009, 08:16:53 AM
Lovely photos but for me the choice was easy this time.  I think 7-19 is outstanding!
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Paddy Tobin on February 21, 2009, 09:16:31 AM
The terns photographs is one of those which brings the instant "Wow" reaction. A brilliant photograph.

Paddy
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Lesley Cox on February 21, 2009, 08:19:04 PM
Can't disagree with that but I also love the owlet babies
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 21, 2009, 09:52:31 PM
RESULTS FOR CLASS SEVEN


FIRST          19
SECOND=    8
SECOND=    21

CLASS EIGHT TO FOLLOW LATER
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 21, 2009, 10:25:26 PM
CLASS EIGHT

For a computer enhanced image of alpine plants - let your imagination run free.

TEN ENTRIES
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: maggiepie on February 21, 2009, 11:10:46 PM
I like 8-1 :)

I also would like to know what the little bird in 7-21 is, another teriffic pic,  it appeals to me on an emotional level. :) :)
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Anthony Darby on February 21, 2009, 11:23:16 PM
OMG - what fabulous pics. What treat for the eyes. Thank you Cliff.

The little bird in 7-21 looks like a dipper (Cinclus cinclus), which is common along streams in the UK. They feed on aquatic insect larvae by diving underwater. One of the few all-year-round resident insectivores.

The beetle in 7-9 looks like a British burying beetle but clearly isn't. It is Mylabris polymorpha which is found in the warmer parts of Europe. Adults visit flowers (no, really) but the larvae develop in the egg cocoons of grasshoppers.
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 22, 2009, 08:04:34 AM
Thanks Anthony ... both the images that you mentioned were untitled, but the exhibitor of the dipper is a confirmed bird watcher, both in the U.K. and abroad, and the photo of the beetle was probably captured in the Picos, knowing the travel habits of the photographer.

RESULTS FOR CLASS EIGHT

FIRST       8
SECOND   3
THIRD      1

Many thanks to the exhibitors for their splendid entries and to you, the members of this forum, for your feedback and for your obvious enjoyment of our parochial competition.

Class winners received token prizes of £5 and winner of 'Best in Show' received a beautiful paperweight trophy to keep for twelve months and a £10 prize.

The photograph selected by the audience as 'Best in Show' was 7-19 ... 'TERNS IN PARALLEL FLIGHT'

Contest over for 2008-2009.   
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: JohnnyD on February 22, 2009, 10:36:05 AM
So the competition is over - and some of the winners known, but there is more ......

While Cliff very kindly identified those pics where I was the winner, he studiously avoided telling everyone which were his.

I can now reveal that he was the winner in classes 1, 6 & 7, and winner of the overall prize with his stunning 'Terns in Parallel Flight.'

It is worth noting that the WOW factor was every bit as evident on the night for this picture as it has been on the forum.
While every class winner had support in the final reckoning Cliff had more than half the total votes cast - a landslide by any reckoning.

Congratulations Cliff, and thanks again for the terrific effort in putting together the original idea, the format and sponsoring this thoroughly absorbing thread.

Here's to next year?

Cheers,
JohnnyD.
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: maggiepie on February 22, 2009, 12:10:12 PM
Anthony, thanks for the bird ID. :)

Cliff, thanks for posting this thread, I for one have thoroughly enjoyed the pics not to mention the suspense    ;D ;)
Congratulations to all involved.
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: fermi de Sousa on February 23, 2009, 04:19:02 AM
Cliff,
thanks for the wonderful SHow - the pics are excellent, but Section 8 was really amazing! I would've given 5 the top prize! The thumbnail appeared to be of a bullethole through glass but the enlarged pic is like an ice sculpture of the hoop petticoats! I love it!
cheers
fermi
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Lesley Cox on February 23, 2009, 07:37:44 PM
My sister has (and I covert) a piece of Lalique glass - a platter - not dissimilar. It has chrysanthemums.
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: fermi de Sousa on February 24, 2009, 07:26:53 AM
My sister has (and I covert) a piece of Lalique glass - a platter - not dissimilar. It has chrysanthemums.
I think you mean that you covet it ;D ; unless you meant to say that you covertly covet it? ???
cheers
fermi
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 24, 2009, 07:35:58 AM
Nice little property in your avatar, Fermi ... have you been speculating?
I could covet that front garden.  :D :D :D
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Lesley Cox on February 24, 2009, 07:24:02 PM
Thanks Fermi. Yes, covet.
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: Lesley Cox on February 24, 2009, 07:25:10 PM
He bought this before the current recession when property in Aus was still very expensive. He went for the low-cost Indian version.
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ian mcenery on February 24, 2009, 07:33:58 PM
Cliff just been spending a happy few minutes getting up to date on theis great thread. One of the piccies seems familiar but I can't seem to place it can you tell me where it was taken from please?

 http://www.srgc.org.uk/smf/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=3062.0;attach=105601;image (http://www.srgc.org.uk/smf/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=3062.0;attach=105601;image)
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ranunculus on February 24, 2009, 09:02:30 PM
Hi Ian,
The image was taken at the top of the Val Gardena and the general area can be seen on the left hand side of the Pic. No. 2 on Page Seven of this topic.
Cheers,
Cliff
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: fermi de Sousa on February 25, 2009, 03:09:59 AM
Nice little property in your avatar, Fermi ... have you been speculating?
I could covet that front garden.  :D :D :D
You wouldn't want it, Cliff; too many feet to trample the buttercups! ;D
I'll PM you about that pic.
cheers
fermi
Title: Re: DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPETITION 2008-2009
Post by: ian mcenery on February 25, 2009, 08:14:11 PM
Thanks Cliff is the first photo of Sasso Lungo - a magnifiicent rock  8)
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal